PDF

Financial Reporting Framework: Reporting on baseline and progress towards 2015

  published: 17 Mar 2022
Identification of respondent
Austria
Focal point for resource mobilization
Contact details of the respondent
Andrea H. Nouak
BMK
I/9
  • +43 1 71162 611616
2018-02-06
1. International financial resource flows

1.1 Please indicate the amount of resources provided by your country in support of biodiversity in developing countries, in particular least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition.

Please indicate, as appropriate, the nominal amount of financial resources provided by source as well as the total amount. Please also indicate your degree of confidence in the estimated amount or, alternatively, provide a range of estimates.

Euro Member Countries (EUR)
in units
Year ODA OOF Other flows Total
2006 12,083,000 12,083,000
2007 7,447,000 7,447,000
2008 18,544,000 18,544,000
2009 17,304,000 17,304,000
2010 10,120,000 10,120,000
Average (baseline) 13,099,600 0 0 13,099,600
  • Bilateral
  • Multilateral
Commitments
  • Directly related
  • Indirectly related
  • Directly related
  • Indirectly related
OECD DAC Rio markers
50%
High
High
Low
While a discount factor of 50% has been applied in general for all activities assigned with CBD Marker 1, for Austrian contributions to the Global Environmental Facility a different factor has been applied. In this case 33% of the overall GEF contributions have been reported as CBD relevant. Please note also that no GEF contribution has been included in the figures for the year 2014, as the contributions for 2014 haven been only committed by early 2015 and thus have been included in the 2015 numbers. Data reported under Other Flows account for private sector finance mobilized through the Austrian Development Agency´s Business Partnership instrument.
Year ODA OOF Other flows Total
2013 29,101,000 0 29,101,000
2014 10,522,000 0 100,000 10,622,000
2015 18,035,000 0 461,000 18,496,000
Methodological information:
High
High
Low
  • Some measures taken
2. Inclusion of biodiversity in priorities and plans
Some inclusion achieved
included in several strategies, for example on forests, wetlands, CSR; included in MbO-goals included in the Three year programmes for development cooperation link: http://www.entwicklung.at/en/themes/environment-natural-resources/
3. Assessment and/or evaluation of values
  • Some assessments undertaken
fields of assessment are for example agriculture, forests, national parks;
4.Reporting current domestic biodiversity expenditures
Euro Member Countries (EUR)
in units
Year Domestic expenditures Overall confidence
2011 588,186,464 High
2012 579,427,792 High
2013 563,351,582 High
2014 549,265,566 High
2015 424,404,566 High
Average 540,927,194 High
Numbers above cover Expenditures directly related to biodiversity Expenditures indirectly related to biodiversity
Government budgets – central
Yes
Government budgets – state/provincial
Yes
Government budgets – local/municipal
Yes
It is unfortunately impossible to provide the complete figures esp. with regard to NGOs and private companies as we dont know these figures. The national information campaign "VielfaltLeben" involves also private sector as well as NGOs;
No such assessment necessary
5. Reporting funding needs, gaps, and priorities

Please indicate your annual estimated funding need (for instance, based on your revised NBSAP) and calculate the estimated funding gap by subtracting estimated available resources. Indicate actions for priority funding.

Please start with the year which is most appropriate for your own planning purposes.

Euro Member Countries (EUR)
in units
it is unfortunately impossible to calculate that seriously - the financial requirements would be almost infinite.
6. National finance plans
Please provide a brief synthesis of your finance plan, by indicating, in the table below, your planned resource mobilization, by source, and their respective planned contributions towards your identified finance gap.
Euro Member Countries (EUR)
in units
  • Some measures taken
There are smaller projects with private companies and NGOs
8. Availability of financial resources for achieving targets
No
No
No